Your dealers configure the product on screen, watch it change as each option is chosen, and send a priced quote before the meeting ends. Visual CPQ puts the build, your rules, and each dealer’s own prices in one flow. The buyer approves a picture of what they are buying, instead of a spec sheet they have to imagine.
Visual CPQ is configure, price, quote with the product on screen as it is being configured. The buyer approves a picture of the build rather than a line on a spec sheet. It carries the manufacturer's option rules and prices underneath the view, so the thing on screen is also the thing being quoted.
The option rules, the price book, the quote document, and the view of the product itself. Visual CPQ holds all four behind one screen. A change to an option price reaches the picture, the total, and the quote in the same moment, instead of in three separate updates somebody has to remember to make.
A configured sale runs on a salesperson describing something the buyer cannot see. Put the build on screen and that conversation ends: the picture answers the question, and what is left to talk about is the price and the date. Vendors sell this half as cpq visualization, and the word is accurate as far as it goes.
Written and kept current by the team that builds Dealect, in Mississauga, Canada. Who builds Dealect.
Visual CPQ is the one of the three where the buyer watches the product change while it is priced. CPQ is the wider configure, price, quote loop, with the approvals and the order trail behind it. A product configurator stops at a valid build with no price on it. Which one you need depends on whether your buyer can picture what they are ordering.
| In a configured deal | Visual CPQ | CPQ | Product configurator |
|---|---|---|---|
| What the buyer sees | The product itself, changing as each option is chosen | A quote document, once somebody has produced it | The product, with no price attached to it |
| What it decides | Which builds are valid, and what each one costs | The price, the discount, and who has to approve it | Which combinations of options can be built |
| What comes out | A priced configuration and a quote carrying its picture | A quote, an order, and the approval trail behind it | A valid specification |
| What it reads from | Your option rules and each dealer's own price list | Price books, discount rules, CRM and ERP records | Your options and the rules between them |
| What it does not do | Replace the rules underneath it. The view is the interface | Show the buyer the build it is pricing | Put a number on anything |
In practice all three arrive as one screen. A product configurator is the part that knows what can be built. Visual CPQ is that part with the price and the picture attached, in front of a buyer who is deciding. CPQ software for manufacturing is the name for the whole loop once approvals and downstream systems hang off it. Choosing between the three is usually the wrong question. Whether your buyer can picture what they are signing for is the right one. And if the letters themselves are new, our guide to what CPQ means starts from zero.
A configured product is described in writing, approved in writing, and built from that writing. Every gap between what the words said and what the buyer pictured arrives later, as a change.
A parts list and a set of dimensions are not a picture. Two people can read the same sheet, agree on every line of it, and still be holding two different products in their heads when they shake hands.
Nothing was mis-built and nobody made a mistake. The specification was correct and the expectation was not, which is the most expensive kind of correct there is.
The questions a picture would have answered come back as emails instead. Someone in your office produces a sketch, sends it, and waits, and the deal sits still for as long as that takes.
The moment a buyer finally sees the thing is the moment they notice what they wanted instead. Visual CPQ moves that moment forward to before the quote is signed, which is the one place it costs nothing.
Visual CPQ runs the four moves a good rep already makes. The difference is that the product is on screen for all four of them.
Step 01 · The questions, in selling order
The configurator asks what a good rep already asks, and in the same order: the size first, then the material, then the options that depend on both. Your rules sit behind every answer, so a combination your shop will not build is never offered. The model redraws as each question is answered, which means the buyer watches their own decisions accumulate rather than waiting for a summary at the end.
Step 02 · The thing on screen is the thing being priced
Not a similar model, and not the catalog photograph of the nearest standard product. The phrase vendors use for this is cpq visualization, and it earns the name only when the render is driven by the same configuration the quote is built from. The difference shows the second a buyer asks what the wider span looks like: they get an answer in the room, rather than a promise to send a drawing on Thursday.
Step 03 · The total moves with the view
Every option carries its own price, so the number changes on the same click that changes the picture. The prices are the ones you quote by hand today, not a rounded package figure. Each dealer works from their own price list and watches their own margin while they build. A visual CPQ that shows one price to one anonymous buyer is a demo, not a quoting tool.
Step 04 · A document, while the buyer is still looking
The configuration becomes the quote in the room, its line items and its total taken straight from the build that was just made. The picture goes with it, so what the buyer opens tomorrow shows what they approved today. That attachment is the part visual CPQ adds to an ordinary quote, and it is the part that ends the argument before it starts.
A dealer configures a build, watches the price update itself, and sends the order to the factory. No call and no form to watch it.
Every page on this subject calls itself visual CPQ and none of them says which kind of picture you actually need. Three answers, and a verdict at the end of them.
The model is rebuilt in the browser on every click, so any combination of options can be shown without anyone having rendered it first. That is what cpq with 3d actually buys: a product line with a hundred thousand valid builds needs no image library, because there are no images. It is the right default wherever the shape itself changes with the order, and the engine behind it is our 3d product configurator.
A layered 2D view swaps flat artwork as the options change. It is cheap to build and it loads instantly on a phone with one bar of signal on a job site. For products that vary in finish and trim rather than in shape, it tells the buyer everything they need to decide. Where a 3d cpq would mean rebuilding your whole catalog as geometry, 2D is often the honest answer.
Offline rendering produces images good enough for a brochure cover, at minutes per frame rather than milliseconds. Photorealistic cpq exists, and it is genuinely useful for the twelve hero shots on your website. It is not what a dealer configures against: a buyer who waits ten seconds for a picture stops changing options.
The buyer has to recognise the build and see the choice they just made. They do not have to count the grain in the cedar. Fidelity past that point costs money at every stage and changes no decision. Photorealism belongs in your catalog, and visual CPQ belongs in front of the buyer.
Visual configuration is the half of this that everyone demonstrates, and it is the half that decides nothing. A photorealistic render of a build that cannot be manufactured is still a build that cannot be manufactured. What makes a visual quote safe to send is the layer underneath the render: the option dependencies, the exclusions your shop actually works to, and the price book the total is assembled from. Those two layers are what the quote is built out of, and the render contributes nothing to the document at all. That is also where the work of setting one up goes. The rules are the part nobody has ever written down, and the render is the part any vendor can show you inside an hour. Visual CPQ is the whole stack, not the top of it.
Every vendor on this subject sells the view as the product. The quiet part is worth saying, because it is what a manufacturer is actually buying: the view is the interface and the rules are the engine. Visual configuration software that renders beautifully and validates nothing produces quotes you have to walk back, and it produces them faster than the old way ever did.
So a visual CPQ is judged on what it refuses to quote, not on how good the render looks. That is the one thing worth asking about in any demo you sit through, and it is the question a render cannot answer for you however good it looks.
In July 2026 we read the fourteen pages ranking in the US for visual CPQ and for 3D CPQ. Not one of them mentions dealer-specific pricing. That is not how a dealer network works: the same configured build carries three separate figures at the same time, and each party is shown only theirs.
A dealer who cannot see their own margin is guessing, and a dealer who can see your cost price is negotiating with it. The whole three-tier picture, drawn as a table, is on our 3d product configurator page.
Most lists on this subject run past a dozen features and recommend none of them. Visual CPQ comes down to four, and three of the four sit underneath the picture.
The view has to redraw faster than a buyer changes their mind, on the laptop the dealer already owns and over the connection a job site actually has. A configurator that stutters gets closed, and the meeting goes back to the spec sheet it was supposed to replace.
The picture will happily show a span nobody can weld. Option dependencies and exclusions have to run on the same click as the render, so an impossible combination is refused at the option rather than caught on the shop floor three weeks later. This is the line between visual CPQ and a 3D viewer with a price label on it.
Every option priced on its own line, recalculated on the click that changed the picture. Not a total assembled at the end, and not a range. The dealer watches their own margin while they build, which is what makes them willing to build in front of the buyer at all.
The document is generated from the configuration with the render attached to it, so what the buyer opens tomorrow is what they approved today. Nothing is transcribed. Used this way it is also a sales configurator: one flow that ends at a signable document rather than a saved specification.
Carports, shelters, mezzanines, enclosures. Anything whose shape changes with the site it goes on.
Bodies, decks, axles, equipment packages. The option list is longer than the catalog by an order of magnitude.
Machines specified to a duty rather than picked off a shelf, with capacity and clearance driving everything downstream of them.
Saunas, kitchens, pool enclosures, pergolas. Sold on a picture long before anybody reads a specification, which is the family our sauna configurator and outdoor kitchen configurator are built for.
It does not suit a catalog of fixed SKUs with three colour options. Where the buyer can already picture what they are ordering from a photograph and a size, visual CPQ is an expense with nothing behind it and a good order form serves you better. The test is whether the price moves with the choices, and whether the result is something a person has to be shown before they will sign for it. Where dealers do the selling, the picture and their own prices arrive together in your b2b customer portal.
Two questions nobody on this subject answers. The first one is the reason a shop without a CAD library never gets as far as calling anybody.
Visual CPQ is priced per manufacturer rather than per seat or per render. Three things set the number: how many products, options and rules your configurator has to model, how many dealers will quote in it, and which pieces you add, such as extra 3D views or an ERP connection. Dealect quotes it after a 30-minute demo, so the number you hear is for your products rather than a starting point. Two things do not move: your dealers never pay for portal access, and there is no self-serve tier to sign up for. More on what a configurator costs.
Visual CPQ is configure, price, quote with the product on screen as it is configured. The buyer watches the build change as each option is chosen and the price moves with it, so what gets approved is a picture rather than a written specification somebody has to imagine. Underneath the view sit the same two things an ordinary CPQ runs on: the manufacturer's option rules, which decide which builds are valid, and the price book each option is costed from. The render is the interface and those two are the engine, which is why a visual CPQ is judged on what it refuses to quote rather than on how good the picture looks. The finished configuration then becomes the quote with its render attached, so the document the buyer opens tomorrow shows the build they approved today.
Traditional CPQ produces a correct quote and shows the buyer a document. Visual CPQ produces the same quote and shows the buyer the build it is pricing, live, while the options are still being chosen. The rules and the price book underneath are the same, and so is the output: a priced configuration and a signable quote carrying its line items. What changes is where the buyer's uncertainty goes. Under traditional CPQ they approve a parts list and a set of dimensions, then find out at delivery whether what they pictured is what they actually bought. Under visual CPQ they see the build before they sign, so the change order that would have landed after the steel was cut happens instead as a click during the meeting, which is the one place it costs nothing.
No. Shop drawings, a spec sheet, and photographs of a finished build are enough to start, and those three are what a custom shop already keeps on the shelf. The models get built from them. CAD helps where it exists and is never the thing that decides whether you can begin.
It can be 2D. A layered 2D view is cheap to build, instant on a phone, and enough for products that vary in finish and trim rather than in shape. Real time 3D earns its cost where the shape itself changes with the order, which covers most configurable structures and equipment.
Yes. Every dealer works from their own price list and watches their own margin while they configure. The buyer sees one finished price. Your cost price never leaves your side, and no dealer ever sees another dealer's numbers.
It is priced per manufacturer rather than per seat or per render. Three things set the number: how many products, options and rules the configurator has to model, how many dealers will quote in it, and which pieces you add, such as extra 3D views or an ERP connection. Dealect quotes it after a 30-minute demo, so you hear your full number on that call. Your dealers never pay for portal access, and there is no self-serve tier.
Last updated
Manufacturers who moved their dealer network onto Dealect, in their own words.
“A dealer quote used to take me two days of back-and-forth. Now dealers send it themselves in ten minutes — and I just tap approve.”
Request a 30-minute demo, bring one product, and see it configured, priced, and quoted live on the call. We reply by email to set up the time.
Your call is with the Dealect team.
